The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) said multiple screening tests of a 10-year-old dairy cow have indicated possible BSE, or mad cow disease. Confirmatory test results were expected in 3 to 5 days. The carcass was kept out of the human food and animal feed systems, the agency said. The agency said American officials had been informed of the suspected BSE case. “This finding should not have a significant or lasting impact on efforts to normalize trade,” the statement said. “In negotiations with trading partners, including the U.S., Canada has been very open about the prospect of finding more BSE.” See also: The announcement comes on the heels of the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) announcement yesterday of plans to partially lift the current ban on importing of live Canadian cattle on Mar 7. Live Canadian cattle have been barred since Canada’s first BSE case was discovered in May 2003. Because Canada is now considered a “minimal risk” region for BSE, the border will be reopened to live Canadian cattle less than 30 months of age and certain other animals and products, the USDA said. Canada’s BSE-related measures have been based on the assumption that more cases may be found in North America, the CFIA said. “As a result, the confirmation of a new case of BSE would not indicate increased risk to food safety as Canada requires the removal of specified risk material (SRM) from all animals entering the human food supply,” the agency said. SRM are tissues such as the brain, spinal cord, and certain nerve bundles, which are likely to contain the BSE agent if the animal has the disease. The CFIA, in announcing the suspected BSE case, said, “The Government of Canada’s normal policy is to report only confirmed results. However, given the unique situation created by the United States border announcement on December 29 it was decided that the most prudent action would be to publicly announce the available information and provide stakeholders with a full understanding of the current situation.” Dec 30, 2004 (CIDRAP News) Canada today reported what could be its second case of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), only hours after the US government announced plans to ease restrictions on the importation of Canadian cattle. The dairy cow was tested because it couldn’t walk, putting it in a high-risk category in Canada’s BSE surveillance program, officials said. The cow was born before Canada (and the United States) banned the feeding of protein from ruminant animals to other ruminants in 1997. “If BSE is confirmed in this case, consumption of contaminated feed before 1997 remains the most likely route of [BSE] transmission” to the cow, the CFIA said. The CFIA did not say where the suspect cow came from or give any other identifying information about it. Officials said the Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health in Winnipeg, Man., is handling the confirmatory testing. USDA announcement of plan to loosen import restrictions
Johnny Looby was there for Tipp FM Sport and he reviews the action: https://soundcloud.com/tippfmradio/review-of-the-action-at-powerstown-park-in-clonmel
It’s the out-half’s first start for the province since December having recently returned from an ankle injury.Hooker James Tracy who came off the bench for Ireland against Italy last week also starts.
Ideas about planetary evolution are so far off base with observations of exoplanets, it’s time to wipe the slate clean.“Planets in Chaos,” Ann Finkbeiner titles an article in Nature. Actually, the planets are doing just fine, but the theories to explain their origins are so far off, they are not salvageable. The subtitle reads,The discovery of thousands of star systems wildly different from our own has demolished ideas about how planets form. Astronomers are searching for a whole new theory.Her review brings to mind Huxley’s quip that many a beautiful theory was destroyed by an ugly fact. “Not so long ago — as recently as the mid-1990s, in fact — there was a theory so beautiful that astronomers thought it simply had to be true.” It was the core accretion theory (the updated Laplace Nebular Hypothesis). It was beautiful because it fit well with Darwinism’s slow, gradual accumulation of infinitesimal changes. It was beautiful, too, because it explained our solar system’s arrangement: rocky planets near the sun, icy bodies farther out. “And because the same principles of physics and astronomy must apply throughout the Universe, it predicted that any system of ‘exoplanets’ around another star would look pretty much the same.” See? It even made predictions. Good theory.Reality had a way of punishing scientists for extrapolating from a sample of one.But in the mid-1990s, astronomers actually started finding those exoplanets — and they looked nothing like those in our Solar System. Gas giants the size of Jupiter whipped around their stars in tiny orbits, where core accretion said gas giants were impossible. Other exoplanets traced out wildly elliptical orbits. Some looped around their stars’ poles. Planetary systems, it seemed, could take any shape that did not violate the laws of physics.The sad conflagration of the beautiful theory has been told and retold before (3/21/06, 5/21/09, 8/31/10), especially since the Kepler spacecraft turned up the heat. What’s new for July 2014 is that astronomers have still made no progress with alternative theories.The findings have triggered controversy and confusion, as astronomers struggle to work out what the old theory was missing. They are trying ideas, but are still far from sure how the pieces fit together. The field in its current state “doesn’t make much sense”, says Norm Murray of the Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics in Toronto. “It’s impossible right now to account for everything,” agrees Kevin Schlaufman, an astrophysicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge. Until researchers reach a new consensus, they will not be able to understand how our own Solar System fits into the grand scheme of things, let alone predict what else might exist.It’s not like Nature to leave a tragedy hopeless, so Finkbeiner does offer some glimmers of hope. New concepts of interaction and migration are helping to explain how some planets went wildly eccentric, or how hot Jupiters got so close to their stars, for instance. Many astronomers still believe “core accretion has some things right,” such as the idea that planets are leftover products of the origin of stars. Strangely, she tells the old theory as if it is still true, after having falsified it in the introduction.But then she gets into the era of 2001, the Space Oddities. “It was like, ‘What! We weren’t even looking for that” one astronomer said at the 1995 announcement of the first hot Jupiter. The catalog of unpredicted anomalies has left astronomers scratching their heads. In accordance with Bloch’s Law, “Every solution breeds new problems,” the proferred solutions did just that:To explain hot Jupiters, for example, they suggest that the planets did not stick around at their birth place in the cold outer reaches of stellar disks. Instead, the infant giants spiralled inwards as viscous gas in the disk slowed their orbits. At some point, for reasons unknown, they stopped their death spirals and settled into stable orbits close to their stars. Despite the extreme temperatures, the giant planets had strong-enough gravity to keep hold of their gas.Super-Earths also don’t fit the old “beautiful” theory, she adds; they are even “harder to account for.” But does a pithy analogy help? “Super-Earths are probably not nice, stereotypical birds,” says Eric Ford, an astrophysicist at the Pennsylvania State University in University Park. “Maybe some are more like penguins.” Humor can be a distraction on work time. “The sheer size of the super-Earth flock requires explanation,” she reminds the workers, like a stern boss. “The standard theory cannot do that because in existing models, the central regions of stellar disks contain much too little material to create several close-in super-Earths.”The workers went to work, adding heavier disks, and “migration, migration, migration.” That process seems to be the new dark matter to explain planet-makers’ anomalies. Unfortunately, migration models have their own problems that challenge migration as a scientific theory:Such models are appealing, but the concept of migration, especially of the smaller planets, gives some researchers pause — if only because no one has ever seen it happening. The necessary observations may not be possible: stars young enough to have planets migrating through protoplanetary disks are still surrounded by dust, and their light flickers, making it extremely unlikely that current methods will be able to pick out the dimming caused by a transiting planet. The theory is not settled, either. Modellers have found it hard to explain why migrating planets, big or small, would stop in the orbits that astronomers have observed. In simulations, says Winn, they don’t: “the planets plop right down on the star”.If planets migrate as quickly as models predict, moreover, they should mostly be gone by now, melted to oblivion inside their parent stars. Astronomers should not be oblivious to oblivion. The “biggest question” still hounds them: “why our Solar System is so different.” Our neat arrangement of planets in stable orbits, with a lively planet safe in its habitable zone, doesn’t look anything like the majority of extrasolar planetary systems. Breaking News: One of the most Earthlike planets ever found turns out to be an illusion, New Scientist and National Geographic reported. The “planets” were probably just starspots due to the star’s magnetic field. Farewell, Gliese 581 d. Jacob Aron quipped on New Scientist:Type the name “Gliese 581 d” into a search engine, and you’ll find hundreds of tantalising images of an Earth-like world. The exoplanet has been a top contender for the most life-friendly world beyond our solar system since it was discovered in 2007. There’s just one problem – it probably doesn’t exist.Current status for planet formation theories: bad news.Meanwhile, researchers continue to nurture their mess of models, which have grown almost as exotic and plentiful as the planets they seek to explain. And if the current theories are disjointed, ad hoc and no longer beautiful, that is often how science proceeds, notes Murray. “Life,” he says, “is like that.”Finkbeiner’s happy ending to the story lies in the future. “Future observations may give some answers,” she dreams.Try that excuse at home or at work. Susie, you’re room is a mess. I’m nurturing the mess; life is like that. John, your report did not follow my instructions. It’s exotic; life is like that. Mechanic, you put the parts in the wrong places. It’s disjointed, but life is like that. Lawyer, you’re just making stuff up. It’s ad hoc, but life is like that. Home decorator, you ruined my living room. It’s no longer beautiful, but life is like that. Son, why did you get an “F” on your paper? I got some things right. Bookkeeper, what are these strange entries you put in the ledger? This requires explanation! They’re not your stereotypical birds; maybe some are like penguins. Scientist, everything you said is wrong. Future observations may give some answers.Neil Tyson, what are you going to say about this article? Where is your positivism now?This article is all the more aggravating when you remember that secular cosmogonists have sold a false scenario for centuries since Laplace, propounded non-stop for decades by artwork, textbooks and TV documentaries that have used this debunked theory to prop up a molecules-to-man scenario, supposedly illustrating why science is superior to religion. We’ll take Genesis 1:1 any day over this falsified Nebulous Hypothesis.They’ve had their chance. Give the materialistic storytellers the boot. Earth is a privileged planet (5/24/11) in a designed solar system; that is where the evidence leads. Extrasolar planets can be explained as the end products of destructive processes, not creative processes. Design is evident everywhere; like our own creation, we hold these truths to be self-evident among rational beings on God’s green Earth. (Visited 469 times, 1 visits today)FacebookTwitterPinterestSave分享0
The 16 Days campaign demands an end to gender-based violence.(Image: Department of Women, Children and People with Disabilities)MEDIA CONTACTS • Tanana Cornelius MonamaChief director, communications –Department of Women, Children andPeople with Disabilities+27 12 359 0224 or +27 82 578 4063RELATED ARTICLES• Women’s rights in SA to advance• Towards gender quality in SA• Iraqi gender activists learn from SA• Men-only clinic opens in SASource: Southafrica.infoImagine if, for 16 days, there was no rape, no child abuse. The 16 Days of Activism for No Violence Against Women and Children campaign challenges South Africans to declare a truce on violence against women and children – and, ultimately, to make it a permanent one.For the 13th year, South Africa is taking part in the global 16 Days of Activism for No Violence Against Women and Children campaign, which runs from 25 November (International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women) through to International Human Rights Day on 10 December.President Jacob Zuma and Minister for Women, Children and People with Disabilities Lulu Xingwana will launch the campaign in Kimberley in the Northern Cape on Sunday.While the campaign runs only for 16 days each year, its objectives are reinforced by a year-long programme and a national plan to combat abuse.South Africa is still home to high levels of violence against its women and children, despite a world-renowned Constitution and a legislative overhaul that safeguards women’s and children’s rights.The government, business, civil society organisations, faith-based organisations and the media are all participating in the drive to increase awareness of the negative impact of violence and abuse on women and children.The campaign also aims to:Challenge the perpetrators of violence to change their behaviour.Involve men in helping to eradicate violence.Provide survivors with information on services and organisations that can help lessen the impact of violence on their lives.What you can doSouth Africans are urged to support the campaign by wearing a white ribbon – a symbol of peace – during the 16-day period to symbolise their commitment to never commit or condone violence against women or children.Other ways of supporting the campaign:Speak out against woman and child abuse. Encourage silent female victims to challenge abuse, and ensure that they get help. Report child abuse to the police immediately. Encourage children to report bullying behaviour to school authorities.Men are critical partners in the fight against the abuse of women and children. Men and boys are encouraged to talk about abuse and actively discourage abusive behaviour.Families must stick together to create a safe environment for women and children.Parents and adults can make sure that children are not exposed to sexual and violent material such as pornography.Volunteer some of your time and energy in support of a non-governmental organisation or community group working in your area to help abused women and children. Use your life skills and knowledge to help support victims of abuse.Donate some money to organisations working to end violence against women and children by making a contribution to the Foundation for Human Rights. Tel: 011 339 5560/1/2/3/4/5.Engage in online dialogues such as the Cyber Dialogues organised by Gender Links – see www.genderlinks.org.za – which provides a platform to share issues and experiences and offer solutions, with experts participating in the online chats.Get connected with important contacts and information published on www.womensnet.org.za.Seek help if you are emotionally, physically or sexually abusive to your partner and/or children. Call the Stop Gender Based Violence helpline on 0800 150 150.Report illegal guns to the police – according to the International Action Network on Small Arms Women’s Network, women are three times more likely to die violently if there is a gun in the home.Join a community policing forum (CPF) or community safety forum (CSF) to help fight crime in your area. For information on how to join, contact your local police station.Take part in a 16 Days event – check out the calendar.Rhetoric and realitySouth Africa, according to NGO Gender Links, needs to close the gap between the “rhetoric of gender equality” and the “reality on the ground”.Gender Links says the country has made impressive strides in recognising the roles and rights of women and children.The Constitution recognises gender equality as the cornerstone of South Africa’s democracy, and new legislation – such as the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act and the Domestic Violence Act – have been lauded for enforcing the rights of women.But more needs to be done. “Changing laws can be swift,” says Gender Links. “Giving them effect, and changing the mindsets that often render them ineffective, is a much more demanding task.”
Share Facebook Twitter Google + LinkedIn Pinterest The National Pork Producers Council elected new officers and members to its board of directors at the National Pork Industry Forum.Elected as president of the organization was Jim Heimerl, of Johnstown, Ohio. Heimerl and his wife Kathy, along with three sons and a daughter-in-law, run three farrow-to-finish farms in Ohio and own 80 contract finishing farms in several states. Heimerl Farms LTD also consists of crops and cattle, as well as a trucking division and feed mill. Among other positions, Heimerl previously served as president of the Ohio Pork Council and as a board member of the Ohio Soybean Association.Heimerl takes over from Ken Maschhoff, a pork producer from Carlyle, Ill., chairman of Maschhoff Family Foods and co-owner and chairman of The Maschhoffs, the third-largest pork producer in the United States. Maschhoff now is NPPC immediate past president and chairman of the organization’s Trade Policy Committee.
MS Dhoni is a master of the longwinded answer, but on this tour to the Emerald Isle for the World Twenty20, he has come up with some surprise quotable quotes.On Thursday, when he was asked about the Australians’ short-pitched bowling plans for Friday’s Super Eights game here, the India skipper snapped back: “For the last five years, whenever we have had press conferences, we say some new things but they have been talking the same thing. There’s nothing new from their side to say. We are concentrating on the areas where we have to work on, and we will keep doing that.”The short ball is as much of a problem for us as it is for anyone else. We have seen every batsman get out to the short ball. It all depends on how quick your bowlers are. If someone is bowling at 140-145 km/h, he will definitely look to bowl short-pitched deliveries.”Australian skipper George Bailey, meanwhile, is not looking to exact any ‘revenge’ from Dhoni, who has played him in only four IPL games for the Chennai Super Kings over the last four years. “The structure of IPL is such that you can’t play more than four overseas players. One thing that I have learnt from my days with CSK is the consistency in team selections. This game can be very fickle and you don’t decide on basis of one or two performances,” Bailey said.The Tasmanian warned his teammates not to focus too heavily on Harbhajan Singh, who is back in form and has a history of run-ins with the Aussies. “We don’t want to focus too heavily on one bowler. It’s not that we focus too much on Harbhajan and don’t focus on Ashwin. All the Indian bowlers are pretty good.”advertisement
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Man City striker Aguero admits being Liverpool and Owen fanby Paul Vegasa month agoSend to a friendShare the loveManchester City striker Sergio Aguero admits he grew up a fan off Liverpool.And he says Michael Owen was his favourite striker.Aguero has been Manchester City’s main man for eight years, winning four Premier League titles in the process. His latest league triumph came at the expense of Liverpool, who were searching for their first in the competition. Owen revealed his own admiration for Aguero in his book when discussing the finishing of United striker Marcus Rashford.He argued: “Players like Robbie Fowler, Aguero or Harry Kane, these people who are obsessed with goals. I don’t think he is obsessed with goals.”It seems the respect is mutual, as Aguero wrote in his autobiography Born To Rise: “I’ve always liked Liverpool, maybe because I used to play for Independiente who also played in red.”As a kid, I wanted to be Michael Owen and when I saw him score that goal for England against Argentina I thought ‘you little sh**’! Even aged 10, I knew they couldn’t allow him that much space. He was a terrific player at that time.” About the authorPaul VegasShare the loveHave your say
Dennis Ward APTN National NewsGrassy Narrows First Nation in Ont., is a community very much in mourning.A recent suicide pact by a group of youth has left a young girl in intesitve care.The tragedy has the community trying to move [email protected]